Sunday, 24 July 2016

Residents urgently need to respond to the July CREST Planning Application to Ipswich Borough Council & petition local councillors with your concerns

Please be advised that there are now 2 applications which need to be processed by the Borough; (Mersea/CBRE (2014)) and now Crest.  IBC might possibly determine these at a planning committee before we receive the outcome of the Inquiry in Public of the Core Strategy Review. It is the Core Strategy which should govern ALL future Planning Applications up until 2031.

NB. SOCS who attended and gave evidence at the Core Strategy Inquiry, only saw 2 IBC Councillors in attendance during the 11 days of the Inquiry.

They Councillors were Lockington (St Margarets), who attended & gave evidence & 

Councillor Jones who attended for a short periods. 

No other Councillor including other members of the IBC Planning Committee from IBC attended.
 
Below, click on SOCS downloadable form for better viability and to print;


What else can you do as well as  writing a personal letter to IBC?

 Petition BOTH your local Suffolk County Councillors and Ipswich Borough Councillors with your concerns & send questions to and attend Area Committees.


 "Area Committees give you the chance to raise your views, share your opinion and contribute to positive changes in your neighbourhood. As a resident of Ipswich, this is your opportunity to say what you would like to see improved."



Friday, 8 July 2016

Ipswich Garden Suburb: On behalf of: Ipswich Borough Council Stage 2 Report Viability Assessment -development area and phasing


The following Ipswich Borough Council Viability Report by Gerald Eve is available;

https://www.ipswich.gov.uk/content/core-document-library-post-submission-documents

 Probably of most interest to local residents will be the following map and table.

Map after page 94



 Table after page 97
 






















 

Monday, 4 July 2016

Departure from Development Plan IP/16/00608/OUT Crest Nicholson


Departure from Development Plan

IP/16/00608/OUT

Land North Of Railway And East Of Henley Road 
 
An outline planning application for a mixed use development comprising up to 1,100 residential dwellings (use class C3); a local centre (to accommodate up to 250sqm (net) of convenience floor space (A1), up to 300sqm of comparison floorspace (A1), up to 250sqm in use classes A1-A5 and up to 500sqm community centre (D1)); provision of land for a primary school (D1); provision of sports facilities, Country Park (including visitor centre D1); open space (including amenity space, children's play areas and allotments) and sustainable urban drainage systems; associated landscaping, infrastructure and engineering /earthworks; creation of 2 No. new vehicular accesses from Henley Road, 1 No. vehicular access from Westerfield Road (to serve Country Park only), pedestrian/cycle bridge over railway and vehicular bridge over railway. 
 
An Environmental Statement has been submitted with the application under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 (as amended).


For: Crest Nicholson

We welcome the views of local residents and interest groups on planning applications.

 

 








Ipswich North Fringe -"Ipswich Garden Suburb"- Crest submit "Henley Gate" Planning Application

SOCS has received the following today;

Dear All,

Crest Nicholson have submitted an outline planning application for their part of the Ipswich Garden Suburb development. Public consultation on the application has commenced and details can be viewed on the Council’s website using reference number 16/00608.

The proposal includes provision of up to 1,100 homes, country park, primary school and retail/community provision.

As members of the Planning and Development Committee and representatives of groups with a particular interest in the Ipswich Garden Suburb, I would like to invite you to an information session for this most recent planning application. The session will consist of a presentation to be given by the applicants, followed by an opportunity for you to ask questions about the proposals. We would expect the presentation to be around 30 minutes followed by an hour of Q & As.

Councillor Jones will chair the session.

Regards

Rosalynn Claxton
Principal Planning Officer - Special Projects
Ipswich Borough Council
01473 43 2915
rosalynn.claxton@ipswich.gov.uk
www.ipswich.gov.uk
www.facebook.com/IpswichGov
twitter.com/IpswichGov




Information Session - Ipswich Garden Suburb - Planning Application 16/00608 
Grafton House, Orwell Room
14 Jul 2016 14:00 to 15:30


The website link advised in the Newsletter "www.henleygate.co.uk "



 henleygate.co.uk

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Residents - Local Red House area, (North Ipswich Fringe ); both former Red House Park TPO area and Tuddenham Road, roadside trees are under threat, again... Please be vigilant.

Local residents are upset that illegal damage to local trees with Protection Orders has been occurring on our "Undesigated Heritage Site" at Red House Farm off Tuddenham Road. SOCS have approached IBC and alerted the landowner Mr. Nowosad.

It is also  being dealt with by ward councillor Inga Lockington and SOCS representatives.

In the event you witness this happening, please alert Ipswich Borough Council by phone immediately 

Out of hours - emergencies (e.g.environmental issues) 01473 433444 

Let SOCS (text details to 07749773705) & your councillors know.

As well as being in breach of the law, The Town and Country Planning (Tree Preservation)(England) Regulations 2012, which came  into force on 6th April 2012 and can incur hefty fines, IF the appropriate authority, IBC, take enforcement action. 

Help SOCS ensure they do!

 

Anyone who contravenes an Order by damaging or carrying out work on a tree protected by an Order without getting permission from the local planning authority is guilty of an offence and may be fined.
There is also a duty requiring landowners to replace a tree removed, uprooted or destroyed in contravention of an Order. This duty also applies if a tree outside woodland is removed because it is dead or presents an immediate risk of serious harm. The local planning authority may also impose a condition requiring replacement planting when granting consent under an Order for the removal of trees. The authority can enforce tree replacement by serving a ‘tree replacement notice’. 

Sometimes the Hedgerows Act is also breached. If you own or manage a countryside hedgerow (or hedgerow trees), understand the rules and responsibilities involved if you want to remove or work on them.

Countryside hedgerows: regulation and management


First published:
Part of:Land management and Biodiversity and ecosystems
 Natural England

Particle pollution (also called particulate matter or PM) is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. Some particles, such as dust, dirt, soot, or smoke, are large or dark enough to be seen with the naked eye. Others are so small they can only be detected using an electron microscope.
How Big is Particle Pollution?
Graphic of PM2.5
See a larger version of the image here
Particle pollution includes "inhalable coarse particles," with diameters larger than 2.5 micrometers and smaller than 10 micrometers and "fine particles," with diameters that are 2.5 micrometers and smaller. How small is 2.5 micrometers? Think about a single hair from your head. The average human hair is about 70 micrometers in diameter – making it 30 times larger than the largest fine particle.
These particles come in many sizes and shapes and can be made up of hundreds of different chemicals. Some particles, known as primary particles are emitted directly from a source, such as construction sites, unpaved roads, fields, smokestacks or fires. Others form in complicated reactions in the atmosphere of chemicals such as sulfur dioxides and nitrogen oxides that are emitted from power plants, industries and automobiles. These particles, known as secondary particles, make up most of the fine particle pollution in the country.

Friday, 1 April 2016

Food for thought? LOCAL PLANS: Report to the Communities Secretary and to the Minister of Housing and Planning MARCH 2016

Ipswich Borough Council are in the throws of the Examination in Public of their Local Plan Review- reading this certainly focuses minds.

 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508345/Local-plans-report-to-governement.pdf

John Rhodes – Have the Last Four Years of the #NPPF just been a Bad Dream Then?
by andrew lainton

https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2016/03/30/john-rhodes-have-the-last-four-years-of-the-nppf-just-been-a-bad-dream-then/

"Four years ago when the NPPF was being mooted many of us warned

-It would lead to less housing being allocated in local plans

-The government would need to set firm rules for SHMAs and allocation of OAN

-The DTC would be no substitute for strategic planning

-The abolition of strategic planning would be a disaster

-It would take years for cooperative arrangements for joint working and agreement of housing overspill to work through.

John Rhodes of course poo pooed all of these.  Now in his Local Plan Experts Group Report he admits all of this was true.  Expert at what; screwing up planning and now realising that you have failed spectacularly?"


Wednesday, 23 March 2016

Drainage and transport concerns at Northern Fringe exhibition

Today saw the conclusion of the Stage 1 Inquiry in Public of the Ipswich Borough Examination of the Core Strategy Review

Also;

Drainage and transport concerns at Northern Fringe exhibition

 http://www.ipswichstar.co.uk/news/drainage_and_transport_concerns_at_northern_fringe_exhibition_1_4466991 

 23 March 2016  

 
Housebuilders Crest Nicholson is hoping to lodge a planning application to develop “Henley Gate” on land between Henley Road and the East Suffolk rail line during the summer.

Related issue;

Air quality: MEPs approve new national caps on pollutants

Plenary Session Press release - Public health − 28-10-2015
 
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20151022IPR98807/Air-quality-MEPs-approve-new-national-caps-on-pollutants
 
EU Commission plans for more ambitious national caps on emissions of six key pollutants, including NOx, particulates and sulphur dioxide, were endorsed by Parliament on Wednesday. Air pollution causes about 400,000 premature deaths in the EU yearly, and the plans could save up to €40bn in air pollution costs by 2030.

“Air pollution imposes enormous human and economic costs. It also damages the natural environment, through eutrophication and acid deposition, and it doesn’t stop at EU member states’ borders”, said lead MEP Julie Girling (ECR, UK). Her report was approved by a show of hands.

“This legislation will help at all levels of governance in the member states, including the regional and sub-regional authorities who have engaged so vigorously in the process. There is a real bottom-up demand for action”, she added.

“My report also pushes the Commission to ensure that the Real Drive Emissions (RDE) procedure is agreed on as soon as possible. We all agree that NOx must be dealt with urgently. The public are demanding action in this area following the recent revelations on the car industry”, she concluded.